Area III - Curriculum & Instruction

Topic outline

• 

  General

  • Program Performance Profile (PPP)

  • Extent of Compliance

  • Self - Survey

• 

  PARAMETER A. CURRICULUM AND PROGRAM OF STUDIES

  SYSTEM - INPUTS AND PROCESSES

  S.1. As Graduate Education is the apex of the educational system, its curriculum should showcase the best of the academic and intellectual products and processes of the system through the development of the following professional competencies:

        S.1.1. acquisition of advanced knowledge and theories based on the field of specialization/discipline;

        S.1.2. application of theories to actual problems in the field;

        S.1.3. ability to discover new knowledge through the conduct of research in the doctoral program and

        S.1.4. demonstration of enhanced skills to carry out the application or strategy in actual complex work settings.

  S.3. The curriculum reflects the local, regional, and national development goals as well as institution's vision and mission

  
  

  IMPLEMENTATION

  I.1. The curriculum/program of study meets the requirements and standards of CHED and the Professional Regulations Commission (PRC).

        I.1.1. Master's thesis program - 36 units inclusive of (6) units thesis; Ph.D. program - be based on CMO.

        I.1.2. Master's non-thesis program inclusive of six (6) integrating courses - 36 units

        I.1.3. Thesis Master's Program: competencies to undertake research in specific areas with the broad field of educational science and practice; and

        I.1.4. Doctoral Programs: new knowledge and strategies in specific areas within the broad field of educational science and practice.

  I.2. The curricular content is responsive to the needs of the country, recent developments in the profession, and current global trends.

  I.3. The curricular content covers the extent of the professional and technical preparation required of its graduates.

  I.4. The curriculum integrates values, reflective of national customs, culture and traditions in cases where applicable.

  I.5. Opportunities for participation in hands-on activities, such as immersion/practical training and field study are maintained in the

  I.6. The following activities are undertaken to ensure quality in the process of curriculum development:

        I.6.1. participative planning and designing by the following stakeholders:

            I.6.1.1. administration;

            I.6.1.2. faculty,

            I.6.1.3. students;

            I.6.1.4. alumni;

            I.6.1.5. representatives from the industry/sector; and

            I.6.1.6. others (Stakeholders).

        I.6.2. periodic review, assessment, updating and approval of the curriculum by the Academic Council;

        I.6.3. confirmation of the curriculum by the BOR/BOT; and

        I.6.4. others (with approved resolution in 1.6.2).

  I.7. The program of study allows the accommodation of students with special needs and assists them to finish the degree.

   

  OUTCOME/S

  O.1. The curriculum is responsive and relevant to the demands of the times.

  
  
  
• 

  PARAMETER B. INSTRUCTIONAL PROCESS, METHODOLOGIES AND LEARNING PROCESS

  SYSTEM - INPUTS AND PROCESSES

  Syllabus and Instructional Materials

  S.1. There is an institutional outcomes- based standard format in the preparation of course syllabi.

  S.2. The syllabus is a learning contract that must include not only a list of suggested readings and references of print and electronic resources published within the last ten(10) years, but also challenging activities and strategies.

  S.3. Copies of all syllabi during the term are available at the Dean's office or in any other appropriate repository.

  S.4. Copies of all course syllabi in previous semesters are filed for reference purposes

  S.5. Specialized readings discussing and evaluating best practices in specific areas of professional specialization are used as reference materials.

  S.6. There is a mechanism to facilitate the teaching-learning process.

  S.7. There is a Thesis/Dissertation Committee composed of at least 4 graduate faculty for thesis requirements and 5 for dissertation requirements.

  
  

  IMPLEMENTATION

  I.1.The Dean or official concerned approves the updated syllabus for each subject.

  I.2. The faculty prepare syllabi with comprehensive contents.

  I.3. The faculty revise and enhances their syllabi preferably every two years, as needed.

  I.4. The faculty distributes a copy of the syllabus to each student.

  I.5. Teaching strategies stimulate the development of the students' higher-order thinking skills (HOTS) such as critical thinking, analytical thinking, creative thinking and problem-solving.

  Teaching Method and Techniques

  I.6. Classroom instruction is enriched through the use of the following strategies:

        I.6.1. symposia, seminars, workshops, professional lectures;

        I.6.2. educational tours/learning visits/other co-curricular activities;

        I.6.3. peer teaching/cooperative learning; and

        I.6.4. computer-assisted instruction (CAI) and computer-assisted learning (CAL).

  N.B. Additions for a doctoral program:

        I.6.5. case studies, short research projects, readings for reflection and/or reaction.

        I.6.6. appreciative inquiry.

  I.7.At least three (3) of the following course requirements are used:

        I.7.1. group/individual projects;

        I.7.2. group/individual reports;

        I.7.3. group/individual term papers;

        I.7.4. performance activities;

        I.7.5. learning contract;

        I.7.6. portfolio;

        I.7.7. research study;

        I.7.8. others (please specify)

  N.B. For a doctoral program:

        I.7.9. reflection papers;

        I.7.10. reaction papers;

        I.7.11. case study analyses;

        I.7.12. research report (individual/group); and

        I.7.13. others (please specify)

  I.8.At least ten (10) of the following techniques for a master's and doctoral programs are used:

        I.8.1. film showing;

        I.8.2. projects;

        I.8.3. group dynamics;

        I.8.4. case study;

        I.8.5. workshops;

        I.8.6. simulations;

        I.8.7. dimensional question approach;

        I.8.8. brainstorming;

        I.8.9. buzz sessions;

        I.8.10. informal creative groups;

        I.8.11. interactive learning;

        I.8.12. team teaching;

        I.8.13. micro teaching;

        I.8.14. macro teaching;

        I.8.15. tandem teaching;

        I.8.16. peer teaching;

        I.8.17. multi-media/courseware/ teach ware;

        I.8.18. experiments;

        I.8.19. problem-solving;

        I.8.20. type study methods;

        I.8.21. reporting;

        I.8.22. panel discussion; and

        I.8.23. others (please specify)

  I.9. Instruction is enhanced through the following:

        I.9.1. submission of approved and updated syllabus per subject/course;

        I.9.2. regular classroom observation/supervision;

        I.9.3. regular faculty meetings with the Dean/Academic Unit Head;

        I.9.4. regular faculty performance evaluation;

        I.9.5. attendance/participation of faculty in in-service training;

        I.9.6. conduct of experimental classes,

        I.9.7. adoption of alternative instructional delivery modes, such as modular instruction, e-learning and on-line study, etc.

  I.10. Instructional materials (IMs) are reviewed and recommended by a duly created Instructional Materials Committee (IMC).

  I.11. Varied, multi-sensory materials and computer programs are utilized.

  I.12. The College/Academic Unit maintains consortia and linkages with other learning institutions for exchange of instructional materials.

  I.13. The faculty members are encouraged to produce their own instructional materials such as modules, software, visual aids, manuals and textbooks. For a doctoral program, the faculty compiles case studies and on-line materials and readings to supplement IMs in the library.

  I.14. The Institution implements the provisions of CMO 36, s. 1998; CMO 9, s. 2003 and CMO 53, s. 2007 on Thesis/Dissertation writing.

  I.15. The evaluation of master's thesis and of the doctoral dissertation involves an oral examination by the Thesis or Dissertation Committee.

  
  

  OUTCOME/S

  O.1. Course syllabi are updated and approved by concerned authorities.

  O.2. Varied teaching strategies and techniques are efficiently and effectively used.

  O.3. Instructional materials produced by faculty are copyrighted and patented.

  
  
• 

  PARAMETER C. ASSESSMENT OF ACADEMIC PERFORMANCE

  SYSTEM - INPUTS AND PROCESSES

  S.1. The program of studies has a system of evaluating the student performance through a combination of the following:

        S.1.1. formative tests such as quizzes, units tests;

        S.1.2. summative tests such as mid-term and final examination;

        S.1.3. project and term papers;

        S.1.4. practicum and performance tests;

        S.1.5. for the doctoral level: reflection/reaction papers and case study analyses; and

        S.1.6. other course requirements.

  S.2. The summative tests are:

        S.2.1. comprehensive enough to test the different levels of cognitive skills and knowledge of content; and

        S.2.2. based on well-designed Table of Specifications (TOS).

  
  

  IMPLEMENTATION

  I.1. Varied evaluation measures are used such as:

        I.1.1. portfolio;

        I.1.2. rubric assessment;

        I.1.3. skills demonstration;

        I.1.4. paper and pencil tests;

        I.1.5. oral examinations;

        I.1.6. group/individual reports;

        I.1.7. group/individual study;

        I.1.8. reaction/reflection papers and research reports (individual or group) for the doctoral level;  and

        I.1.9. others (please specify)

  I.2. Evaluation tools/instruments are reviewed and revised periodically.

  I.3. The faculty members are trained on how to assess student performance properly.

  I.4. The College/Academic Unit encourages and supports assessment for multiple intelligences. 

  I.5. Course and test requirements are returned to the students after results are checked, recorded and analyzed.

  I.6. The system of student evaluation and grading is defined, understood, and disseminated to:

            I.6.1. students;

            I.6.2. faculty; and

            I.6.3. academic administrators.

  
  

  OUTCOME/S

  O.1. The student's academic performance is commendable.

  O.2. Retention rate of students is on average.

  
  
  
• 

  PARAMETER D. MANAGEMENT OF LEARNING

  SYSTEM-INPUTS AND PROCESSES

  S.1. There are policies on management of learning which includes the following:

        S.1.1. students' attendance in class and other academic activities;

        S.1.2. schedule of classes;

        S.1.3. submission of outputs; and

        S.1.4. maintenance of cleanliness and orderliness.

  
  

  IMPLEMENTATION

  I.1. The policies on management of learning are enforced.

  I.2. Students' activities are well-planned and implemented.

  I.3. The faculty continuously guide every student in the class for independent study and research.

  I.4. Outputs are submitted on time.

   

  OUTCOME/S

  O.1. Learning is efficiently and effectively managed.

  
  
  
• 

  PARAMETER E. GRADUATION REQUIREMENTS

  SYSTEM - INPUTS AND PROCESSES

  S.1. There is a policy on graduation requirements.

   

  IMPLEMENTATION

  I.1. The students are regularly informed of the academic requirements of their respective courses.

  I.2. The College/Academic Unit implements a system for student returnees and transferees to meet the residence and other graduation requirements.

  I.3. Graduating students conduct research and other activities prescribed in their respective curricula.

  I.4. The College/Academic Unit assists the graduating students with academic deficiencies, and other problems which hinder issuance of their clearances.

  I.5. A clearance from academic and financial accountabilities and responsibilities is required before graduation.

  
  

  OUTCOME/S

  O.1. At least 60% of the students enrolled in the program are able to graduate within the regular time frame.

  
  
• 

  PARAMETER F. ADMINISTRATIVE SUPPORT FOR EFFECTIVE INSTRUCTION

  SYSTEM - INPUTS AND PROCESSES

  S.1. The institution has policies on:

        S.1.1. substitution or special arrangements whenever a faculty is on leave or absent;

        S.1.2. giving awards and/or recognition for faculty and students with outstanding achievements; and

        S.1.3. supervision, monitoring and evaluation of faculty performance.

  
  

  IMPLEMENTATION

  I.1 The institution implements rules on the attendance of the faculty in their respective classes and other academic related activities.

  I.2. Dialogues are regularly conducted between administration and the;

        I.2.1. faculty; and

        I.2.2. students.

  I.3. Quality instruction is assured through the following strategies:

        I.3.1. conducting seminars/workshops on syllabi making;

        I.3.2. holding workshops on test construction and the corresponding table of specifications;

        I.3.3. conducting competency assessment;

        I.3.4. conducting supervisory visit of classes and providing assistance, if necessary;

        I.3.5. holding of regular faculty meetings;

        I.3.6. requiring consultations between students and faculty;

        I.3.7. conducting studies on academic performance of faculty and students; and

        I.3.8. providing opportunities for the participation of the faculty in in-service training activities.

  I.4. Periodic faculty performance evaluation on teaching and in other functions is done by at least three of the following:

        I.4.1. the Dean/Department Chairperson;

        I.4.2. the students;

        I.4.3. the faculty member himself/herself;

        I.4.4. peers; and

        I.4.5. others (please specify)

  I.5. The results of performance evaluation are utilized to improve the performance/competencies of the faculty.

  I.6. Students are given recognition for exemplary academic and non- academic performances.

  I.7. Outstanding achievement is recognized and encouraged through the following:

        I.7.1. inclusion in the honor roll, Dean's list, etc.;

        I.7.2. grant of tuition scholarships;

        I.7.3. award of honor medals and merit certificates;

        I.7.4. memberships in honor societies/honor class/sections, etc;

        I.7.5. grant of special privileges such as opportunities in leadership and others (including exemption from major exams on all professional business subjects); and

        I.7.6. grant of awards and recognition for their outstanding academic accomplishments e.g., Best Thesis, Student Researcher of the Year, etc.

  I.8. Indicators on performance of graduates are studied such as:

        I.8.1. feedback from employers regarding performance of graduates.

  
  

  OUTCOME/S

  O.1. The faculty and students have commendable performances as a result of administrative support.

  O.2. The graduates of the program are employable.